Newspaper Revenues
Here’s an article from today’s Washington Post on the fate of newspaper revenues. The gist of the article is how the Internet’s free aspect has contributed to the freefall of newspapers. We may see some go out of business in the next year.
As a former journalism major, I see another problem. When I took journalism classes, emphasis was on being objective in what we reported. Presenting both sides of the story, or at least doing our best to do so. That was a long time ago.
Now I’ve watched the major newspapers erode into tabloid style journalism and major mistakes are made in the quest to beat the Internet to publication or just to be the one to break the story first. In the rush to do that, they sacrifice integrity and quality.
Last week, a subscriber wrote into the WP infuriated that they would spend a front section article describing the First Lady’s clothing that she wore at an event. In the “old” days, I would have expected this to be a photo in a tabloid, not an article and photo in a major newspaper. What she wore isn’t really news. Interesting to read, yes, but was worth the space when something else might have been reported on?
This is just me, but I think that if the newspapers want to compete with the Internet, they need to find something that the Internet can’t give people. Its weakness, which may also be its strength. Anything can go up on the Internet, which means there’s a lot of inaccurate information available. Anyone can say anything they want, including getting very nasty. A newspaper can, quite literally, be an objective filter and because of the paper format can provide different kinds of details.
Can a newspaper give people something different than the Internet? I think so. Though we’ve had ebooks around for a while, they’re still not selling that well because books give people something different than an ebook does. Now the newspapers just need to figure out what that is.